The past week I had the pleasure of presenting at the 13th Annual Ark Conference Competitive Intelligence in the Modern Law Firm.  I am totally blown away that this one day conference is in its 13th year and still going strong. The quality of the presentations was outstanding. There were new and different speakers and sponsors (thanks to Legal Monitor and LAC Group) and all around it was a fantastic day.  I am buoyed by the energy in the room, the passion for the profession and the commitment to the industry despite all of its many challenges.

Some of the key messages coming out of the conference (with my own commentary) were:

  1. Embrace data, data is everywhere and has transformative powers for competitive intelligence as well as for firms in general.
  2. Due Diligence and CI are similar, you can increase your awareness of both in the firm if you measure twice and cut once. Do the work once and share broadly across the firm about clients, and prospects for a variety of reasons, proactively and reactively.
  3. Inter-operability in this new data savvy world is critical.  Get your systems talking to one another, find a Platform.  Whether using AI, or data visualization getting Intel into the hands of decision makers is crucial to success. Capture attention, go on a charm offensive (HT to @CISteph for that great turn of phrase).

For my part, I cannot stress how much I truly believe now is the time for CI to shine in firms and push long standing conservative cultures forward.  I’ve been doing this for close to 20 years and I have never felt more like CI in firms has finally matured in process, structure and delivery.  CI as mix of art and science, data and HUMINT, and CI has the opportunity to sit at the centre of everything firms are doing in support of the practice and business of law as well as the culture shifts that are happening. CI can help firms plan and respond to all three of the major pressures in firms, from bottom up pressure of new associates with different priorities that the traditional law firm model, the top down client pricing pressures and technology assaulting firms from the sides, CI can ease the pressure by anticipating for the future, avoid surprises and providing a strategic way forward.  As firms strive to be more balanced, more focused on wellness and diversity, CI should the centralized function to collaborate on data, gather HUMINT and implement technology that makes organizations coordinated, efficient, balanced, motivated and competitive.  And course, CI can bring the human element to bear as Data Doesn’t Make Decisions.  CI can and should be part of the cultural changes in firms that is paving the way for the firm and the industry of the future.

 

It turns out that the West Coast doesn’t have a lock on law and tech innovation. On this episode, we talk with four guests who are involved in the upcoming NYU Law and Tech: Impact on Innovation, on October 15, 2019.  Our guests today are Felicity Conrad is a NYU grad and CoFounder and CEO of Paladin. Michael Weinberg is the Executive Director at the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at NYU. Christian Lang, Head of Strategy at Reynen Court. And, Anna McGrane is also an NYU Law alum, and is the Co-founder and COO of PacerPro. Each discuss their individual experiences with legal tech innovation, and how the NYU campus is a  launching point for many of its grads toward the legal technology and innovation community. From start-ups to meet-ups, our guests believe that NYU is showing that innovation can have a definite East Coast flavor.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

Information Inspirations

The Return of FREE PACER!!
Northwestern University’s Interdisciplinary team, which includes seven law faculty, including our previous guest, Tom Gaylord, was awarded a National Science Foundation Convergence Accelerator Grant this month. The $1 Million grant will be used to advance Northwestern’s AI-Powered data platform which interfaces with the federal PACER system. The Northwestern Open Access to Court Records Initiative (NOACRI) Team includes lawyers, journalists, economists, and policy makers across the different schools at Northwestern, and they are working to create tools needed to make the data locked in PACER available, and then link that data to public information about the litigants, judges, lawyers, and the courts. We wish them luck!!
Can Congress Regulate Algorithms used in judicial processes?
California Representative, Mark Takano has introduced the “Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act of 2019.” The idea is to create a standards for these algorithms that make them more transparent, especially to the defense teams, not just for the results, but for the entire process. Algorithms used in the courts will also not be able to hide behind trade secrets to prevent those affected by the algorithms from understanding how these results were produced. Can the government actually pull this off? It’ll be interesting to see how this progresses.
Encouraging Law Students to Learn Tech Isn’t Just on the Shoulders of the Law Schools
We added a quick bonus inspiration on what law firms should be doing to encourage 1L’s and 2L’s to learn more about technology while still at the law schools. We hope that this will be it’s own episode soon!
Listen, Subscribe, Comment
Contact us anytime by tweeting us at @gebauerm or @glambert. Or, you can call The Geek in Review hotline at 713-487-7270 and leave us a message. We’d love to hear any ideas you’d like us to cover in future episodes. Also, subscribe, rate, and comment on The Geek In Review on your favorite podcast platform.
As always, the great music you hear on the podcast is from Jerry David DeCicca, thanks Jerry!

Transcript

[00:00:00] Greg Lambert: I don’t know. Are you Tupac or are you Biggie?

[00:00:03] Marlene Gebauer: Tupac.

[00:00:04] Greg Lambert: All right, I’ll be Biggie on this episode.

[00:00:16] Marlene Gebauer: Welcome to The Geek in Review, the podcast designed to cover the legal information profession with a slant toward technology and management. I’m Marlene Gebauer.

[00:00:25] Greg Lambert: And I’m Greg Lambert. So I think, Marlene, we have a record number of guests on the show today as we talk with four of the collaborators of the upcoming NYU Law and Tech Impact on Innovation Conference being held at the NYU Law School on October 15.

[00:00:43] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, it’s going to be a great show. Our guests today are Felicity Conrad, who is an NYU grad and co- founder and CEO of Paladin, Michael Weinberg, the executive director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU. Christian Lang, head of strategy at Reynen Court, and Anna McGrane, who is also an NYU Law alum and is the co-founder and COO of PacerPro.

[00:01:09] Greg Lambert: So they discussed the effect that the NYU Law School has had on the thriving legal tech community in New York, and that the West Coast definitely doesn’t have a lock on innovation.

[00:01:20] Marlene Gebauer: The battle’s on, right?

[00:01:21] Greg Lambert: It is. All right, are you Tupac or are you Biggie?

[00:01:26] Marlene Gebauer: Tupac.

[00:01:27] Greg Lambert: All right, I’ll be Biggie on this episode. All right, but before we get into that, let’s hear this week’s Information Inspiration. All right, Marlene, mine is, and it’s been a while since we’ve said it, but my Information Inspiration this week brings back the call for Free Pacer. So Northwestern University’s interdisciplinary team, which includes seven law faculty, including one of our previous guests, Tom Gaylord, they were awarded a National Science Foundation Convergence Accelerator grant this month.

[00:02:07] Marlene Gebauer: Sweet. Very good.

[00:02:08] Greg Lambert: Well, it’s really sweet because this $1 million grant will be used to advance Northwestern’s AI-powered data platform, which interfaces with the federal PACER system. Powered data platform, which interfaces with the federal PACER system. So I reached out this week to Tom Gaylord and he was pretty excited about the award and hopes that they can actually turn this $1 million into $5 million with additional grants. So good luck to them.

[00:02:35] Marlene Gebauer: Exactly.

[00:02:36] Greg Lambert: So the Northwestern Open Access to Court Records Initiative, NOACRI, I think is how that acronym is.

[00:02:40] Marlene Gebauer: NOACRI for the acronym.

[00:02:47] Greg Lambert: So this team includes lawyers, journalists, economists, and policymakers across the different schools there at Northwestern. And they are working to create tools needed to make data locked in PACER available, and then link that data to public information about the litigants, the judges, lawyers, and the courts. It’s a good thing they’re not in France.

[00:03:10] Marlene Gebauer: That’s right.

[00:03:11] Greg Lambert: So I have high hopes for Tom and the rest of the NOACRI members so that they can put this money to good use and help us get one step closer, not only to free PACER, but a better and more open access to the court docket system.

[00:03:25] Marlene Gebauer: So Greg, do you think Congress can regulate algorithms used in the judicial process?

[00:03:30] Greg Lambert: No.

[00:03:33] Marlene Gebauer: Well, California Representative Mark Tanako says yes. He’s introduced the Justice and Forensic Algorithms Act of 2019. This JIFA, is it JIFA or GIFA?

[00:03:46] Greg Lambert: I think it’s GIFA.

[00:03:47] Marlene Gebauer: Okay, GIFA. Act sets to create federal standards around algorithms used in the judicial process and prohibit defense teams from seeing how algorithms are used and evaluating the evidence by hiding behind trade secret protections. Now, as we’ve discussed before with Drexel Professor Hannah Block Wiebe, issues surrounding bias and actual processes in these mostly black box algorithms can have substantial implications on how courts determine things ranging from bail to sentencing length. According to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC, The computational forensic algorithm standards of this bill would include considerations of bias, accuracy, precision, and reproducibility, and make publicly available documentation by developers of computational forensic software of the purpose and function of the software, the development process, including source and description of training data, and internal testing methodology and results, including source and description of testing data. So we’ll see how this all shakes out.

[00:04:58] Greg Lambert: Yeah, I’m not very confident in what the federal government can do as far as doing this, but they are creating standards, so maybe that will work. I had one quick thing that I wanted to add for the listeners who may not know this. Marlene and I are actually in the Houston studio.

[00:05:19] Marlene Gebauer: Recording studio, AKA your office.

[00:05:19] Greg Lambert: AKA my office tonight. It’s been a little bit of Twitter traffic tonight where Nicholas Shaver, who had tweeted earlier about the fact that she was going through a large group of her fall associates there at her firm, and that only one of them had really any significant training in technology while they were in law school.

[00:05:40] Marlene Gebauer: That’s terrible.

[00:05:43] Greg Lambert: So a law student had reached back out to her to say, look, it’s really hard for us that are techies to figure out a way to express that when we’re doing our clerkships or we’re working as summer associates. So my response was that we’re putting, I think, too much of the onus on the law schools to try and figure this out because they’re creating programs, but we’re not exactly giving them a great path, nor are we encouraging the students to get on that path. So my suggestion is, while we have the 1L and 2Ls in the summer associate program, that we tell them that if their knowledge of technology is really important, their knowledge of technology is really important, that they go back to school and they take those classes and they learn it, and that they should come back stronger when they’re ready to actually practice as fall associates.

[00:06:36] Marlene Gebauer: You know, it’s funny. We hear so much about these different, you know, tech labs and tech training in various law schools, and we’ve interviewed people who run these things multiple times on the podcast, and yet you’re still getting people who haven’t taken any of these classes. And, you know, in addition to what you’re saying, maybe we apply some design thinking and figure out, okay, you know, what are the things that firms want them to know, and then communicate that to the schools and to the students so that they know these are the things that we’re expecting of you.

[00:07:23] Greg Lambert: This sounds like a great program for Cat Moon to take.

[00:07:26] Marlene Gebauer: Exactly.

[00:07:27] Greg Lambert: All right, Cat, you’ve been given your assignment.

[00:07:30] Marlene Gebauer: Tweet away. And that wraps up this week’s Information Inspirations.

[00:07:39] Greg Lambert: Marlene, we had a really good conversation with four of the people that are involved in NYU Law and Tech’s Impact on Innovation Conference, which is being held at NYU Law School next month on October 15th. Anne McGrain from PACER Pro had reached out to me a couple of weeks ago and had given me a heads up on this, and she thought it would be really interesting for us to talk with the folks involved. And she is actually really excited because she thinks there’s a lot of opportunity here to get feedback and perspectives from the legal information profession as well for this conference.

[00:08:16] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, and I think it’s really nice we have an opportunity to sort of highlight some alternative types of conferencing opportunities for folks. We’re joined by a few guests this week, all of whom are involved with the upcoming NYU Law and Tech Impact on Innovation Conference at NYU Law on October 15th. We have Felicity Conrad, who’s an NYU grad and co-founder and CEO of Paladin. Michael Weinberg is the Executive Director at Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy at NYU. Christian Lange is the head of strategy at Rayencourt. And Anna McGrain is also an NYU Law alum and is the co-founder and COO at PACER Pro. Thank you all for taking the time to talk with us today.

[00:09:05] Greg Lambert: So Anna, you and I have been talking a lot lately about this NYU Law and Tech conference. Would you tell us all how this conference got started and why you are drawing on the NYU community as a base for the conference?

[00:09:20] Anna McGrane: Yeah, so you know, I think it’s had a pretty organic start. And it’s mostly a result of just the sheer number of NYU Law alumni who are involved in this space. So both on the law firm management side, in-house, there’s now the NYU Law Venture Fund. There’s several attorneys I know who have left big law practice to become full-time coders. And then, of course, an entire suite of people who have either founded or taken on leadership positions at some of the leading legal technology companies. So everything from Cura Systems to Reply All to, of course, Rayencourt and Paladin. And I think, as far as the NYU community and why this might be a good place for this type of conference, for me, it’s really many of the same reasons that I chose to go to NYU Law over some of the other schools that were similarly ranked. this might be a good place for this type of conference, for me, it’s really many of the same reasons that I chose to go to NYU Law over some of the other schools that were similarly ranked. In part, it had a really diverse background. So most people had taken a couple of years off to work and maybe it was in science or maybe it was in finance, but they weren’t just going straight through. They were doing different things. I also really liked that the school was right in New York. because we talk about the practice of law. You don’t want an entirely academic experience. You really want to be in the thick of things. And I also really did like that it was, that if the school had gone from being something like a top 40 school to a top five, because to me that felt like it was going to be a very dynamic and collegial place where people would be willing to try new things. And I think those qualities are things that are really necessary as an industry, we try and rethink the legal service delivery model. Because if we’re going to get this right, we really need a mix not just of legal minds, but professionals with diverse skills, project management, finance, technology, information architecture, and people who are working together as equal partners, not the traditional pyramid. And those conversations need to be happening in an environment where it’s okay to rethink existing paradigms. And I think that’s one of the things that NYU can really offer.

[00:11:18] Greg Lambert: So there’s something in the water in that part of New York.

[00:11:21] Anna McGrane: I don’t know, you laugh, but location, location, location. It’s a really fun neighborhood that you get people who are looking for balance and quality of life, and then they go off into Big Law and they realize that it could have much better quality of life if some of the tools worked better, or if communication systems were better, or when you started out as a 1L, you got some sort of process map instead of a go back to your computer and figure this out.

[00:11:31] Marlene Gebauer: into big law and they realize they could have much better quality of life if some of the tools worked better, or if communication systems were better, or when you started out as a 1L, you got some sort of process map instead of a go back to your computer and figure this out. Christian, is this the same for you? And can you tell us a little about the New York the legal tech community that you founded? And how is this group similar to or different from the NYU law and tech community?

[00:12:00] Christian Lang: Yeah, absolutely. No, there’s a great resonance between the two communities. I mean, when Anna and I were trying to help kind of get this ball rolling and engage all these other amazing stakeholders, I mean, she mapped out in a really great way why there’s all these kind of existing resources in place, but there’s also this huge opportunity. And there’s also just a huge need for support. I mean, this legal technology vertical and just legal innovation more broadly is something we all care a tremendous amount about. But trying to get involved in it and up to speed in it and make a difference is incredibly painful. And Anna and I have had long conversations about lessons we’ve learned that we feel like it was valuable to go through the process, but somebody should have been able to tell you that. And there’s a lot of great expertise and experience to leverage. And we just have a really kind of wonderful community, I think, to draw upon with a lot of interesting stakeholders. And I actually think, I personally believe that innovation-related conversations, if you truly want to do something transformative, you need to be able to bring a bunch of different people together, looking at kind of common questions through different lenses and different experiences. together looking at kind of common questions through different lenses and different experiences. And so, we thought, you know, NYU is a fantastic community for that. And as a segue, I mean, that’s very resonant with the mission of the Legal Tech Meetup. So, you know, I run, it’s called the New York Legal Tech Meetup. It’s a group that started about two years ago. And it was really born out of a fact that I was kind of a newbie at that time into the legal innovation space and was having a blast getting up to speed. and meeting all these great people and experiencing this wonderful community and going to these conferences and things. But when you walked away from the conferences, this wonderful community that you felt like you had access just kind of dissipated a bit. And then I looked around and saw all of these opportunities for collaboration and support and was like, well, we just need more infrastructure, particularly here in New York, which I’m very bullish should be kind of the center of the legal technology universe to like share information and support one another. So, you know, we threw it up a listing on meetup.com in a very like, let’s just kind of get together and collaborate and support kind of way. And in a way, critically, I think that’s completely free from your typical pay-to-play dynamics of kind of conference and innovation related conversations. And it just kind of struck a chord with people because there were a few hundred folks who signed up immediately. And we were just, I think today crossing the 1500 number mark, which is super exciting. And we, that’s a lot.

[00:14:18] Marlene Gebauer: That’s great.

[00:14:22] Christian Lang: Yeah, we have just people from all different, you know, we’ve got practitioners. We have legal tech startup founders, but people from all over the ecosystem, we deliberately try to activate different constituencies and bring them to the table and try to add value and do everything from demos to panel discussions and things along those lines. but people from all over the ecosystem, we deliberately try to activate different constituencies and bring them to the table and try to add value and do everything from demos to panel discussions and things along those lines. And for me, it is exactly that same idea that we’re trying to, we’ve got a lot of great resources, a lot of cool people, the same thing we’re trying to do at NYU. Let’s bring them together and have meaningful conversations where people are looking at common questions through different lenses and see what we can do.

[00:14:50] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, I’ve actually been to a couple of those meetups, and I thought they were really great because it did bring a bunch of very different people together. I mean, I met a bunch of people that I had never met before, and you go to the conferences and you start to get to know the people, you have the same faces there. And so this was very refreshing. It was very relaxed. And as you pointed out, so it wasn’t a pay to play thing. You could just come there and share ideas very freely.

[00:15:15] Christian Lang: And that’s actually, I just want to underline that because that’s been critical, I think, to the success of the NYU community we’re trying to get going as well. It’s wonderful partners like the school and like the Engelberg Center and people who are willing to provide resources and provide support without asking for, you know, marketing help or whatever the case may be, right? And so in the meetup, we rely on law firms to give us space and food and drink, but otherwise we kind of run it in a very non-profit mindset. And we have the conversations we think are most important and no one can buy their way in. And I think that really moves the needle. People feel like they’re not being taken advantage of and then they are very willing to jump on and support.

[00:15:50] Greg Lambert: So you don’t have to be in Silicon Valley to talk legal tech?

[00:15:54] Christian Lang: No, we’ve got a wonderful, burgeoning and even booming community here in New York that we’re really excited about.

[00:16:00] Greg Lambert: While NYU is the touchstone for this particular conference, you guys are all reaching out beyond the archways of the NYU building. And Anna, who else are you wanting to attract to these types of sessions? Anna? Anna, just a second. Can you start over? You were still muted.

[00:16:18] Anna McGrane: Oh, sorry. Well, we’re not reaching out to anybody. We were thinking a big silence would be the most appropriate way to go into this. So I was going to start with library. Because I do think, as you’re getting more technology services that are being more deeply integrated into legal practice, you have to have information professionals who are trained to understand data sets and algorithms. and compare software. Beyond that, we’ve reached out to the CIO community, the CKO community, IT practice managers, project managers, and then the venture folk. Because what you ultimately want is a conversation between law firms, their clients, which is still going to be a bunch of lawyers, the business people, the people who are creating the technology, and the people who are funding it. So you can think about not only the types of technology that are being built, which of course also the academic community provides that broader normative and institutional vision, but how they’re being built, why they’re being built, how they’re being sold, and what we can do better.

[00:17:19] Marlene Gebauer: So, I want to switch gears for just a sec. We have one of the speakers here with us. So, Felicity is going to be one of the speakers. And before we jump into your session topics, what is it that drew you to this style of conference? And what do you think sets it apart?

[00:17:36] Felicity Conrad: Well, first of all, thank you so much for having me. It’s exciting to be able to share a little bit about this. And for me, I certainly have a soft spot in my heart for NYU as my alma mater. So, I mean, for me, I think it starts there. I co-founded a company called Paladin, and we’re a pro bono tech company. We build software to support pro bono legal services. And for me, when I think about NYU, even beyond kind of this particular conference, I think about a private university working in the public service. It’s really great for me to be able to thread kind of that private sector public service needle through our work and to bring that back to kind of where I first studied law. And then second, to be able to build upon that public service element with the innovation piece. So, that’s something that I think this kind of alumni community is bringing back to the law school and starting to kind of incubate within the law school, hopefully for current students, but also to create a community for all of the folks who started legal tech companies or interested in innovation, who, to Christian’s point, didn’t really have a home. And to kind of bring us back and say, hey, there is a community around this. We can have conversations. And not just conversations around companies or whatever, but also academic conversations and questions about how to think about parameters and morality and all of these sorts of fun things, at least to me. about parameters and morality and all of these sorts of fun things, at least to me. So, that’s kind of what I’m interested in.

[00:19:09] Greg Lambert: So the topic is impact on innovation at the conference. But, Felicity, what specifically are you going to be talking about?

[00:19:19] Felicity Conrad: So I’m hoping to cover a couple things. The first is a little bit of the substance of at least my work, which is the importance of building technology to serve the access to justice gap and what the benefits are there, both from a public service perspective as well as a business perspective. For background, we work with leading law firms, Fortune 500 companies, a little bit law schools and legal service organizations. And they use our software to manage their pro bono program and hopefully serve more pro bono clients, reduce the cost of running their pro bono programs, increase engagement, all that good stuff that innovation and technology can provide. So a little bit how justice is being deployed in access to justice right now, but then also related to the process. How does one go about building a software that’s used by major law firms and major corporate in-house legal teams? For us, we have engaged in co-development pretty religiously, so we work very closely with potential clients within in-house and firm legal departments to brainstorm, process map, prototype, do feedback sessions. So I think we’ll touch on a little bit that method and kind of how that’s led to successful product development.

[00:20:45] Marlene Gebauer: So Michael, I know you’re not speaking, but I know you have an in- depth knowledge of what’s going to be covered by the folks from NYU. So can you tell us a little bit about that?

[00:20:56] Michael Weinberg: Yeah, absolutely. And we’re really excited to be able to participate in this event because one of the big roles of the Engelberg Center is to provide that home for especially students and then the larger NYU community that’s interested in technology and interested in innovation. And that may be by going into a large law firm and practicing there, but it also very much is about law students who graduate and then go on to found companies and work directly in these companies. So one of the people from NYU who’s currently at NYU, not just an alum who will be speaking, is from NYU who’s currently at NYU, not just an alum who will be speaking, is Professor Jason Schultz, and he’s also a co-director of the Engelberg Center here. And Professor Schultz does a lot of work in sort of two areas that are really relevant to this event. The first is thinking about ways to prepare students who want to have non-traditional careers, legal careers in tech. And what you need to do as a law student to prepare yourself to have the kinds of opportunities that are personified by the people who are going to be participating in this conference. And then the other thing that he spends a lot of time working on is as these systems become more important and become more complex, making sure how we understand how they are being used and how they’re being used ethically in a non- discriminatory way, and in a way that really advances the intended goals of the technology. And so, you know, when you’re outside of the company, when you’re maybe a user of the technology, sometimes it feels like you put some information in and a black box does something and then you get something back. And the ways that people who are users of that information or who are affected by the decisions that that technology pushes people towards can make sure that that technology is returning results that are intended by everyone involved. So I know that he’s going to focus on those things. And then we also have students, current students, who have co- founded a new organization here at NYU Law about rights over tech. And it’s really a new student engagement group of students who want to do more engaged and critical thinking about the role of technology. And that includes the largest platforms and all those conversations that are going on. also needs to focus on the technology that we use every day in practice as part of our job.

[00:23:30] Greg Lambert: Now, you said rights over tech. That caught my attention. Can you explain what that is?

[00:23:35] Michael Weinberg: Yeah, it’s a new student group. And it’s funny, it almost feels like a generational change on how students think about, especially law students, think about technology. I think if you went back to when I was in law school, the student technology groups were, and I was part of this, so I can say this, were very, very bullish on technology and really interested in thinking about how to make use of all the upsides that technology will bring. And I think this new group has that optimism about the capability of technology, but also having lived through the last couple of years of technology, recognize that it’s important to bring a more nuanced and potentially more critical approach to that. And so, this is a group that’s really focused on having a holistic approach to discussions about the role of technology and the role that lawyers should have when engaging with technology. And so, we’re really excited the group is here. We’re really excited that the group is participating because it’s a perspective that is healthy to have at an event like this that is so focused on the technology that we’re all using to practice and work more efficiently.

[00:24:48] Greg Lambert: This is a prime example of something that Marlene and I have talked a lot about lately on the show, and that is the Generation Z that are now entering law school. And that dovetails perfectly with some of the values that this new generation has. It’s not just the upside, but they’re looking more holistically at how the technology affects them.

[00:25:14] Michael Weinberg: I think it’s great to see a really good example of something that we’ve been talking about. Here on the show.

[00:25:21] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, it sounds like they’re grappling with the ethics of technology as well as the application of the technology.

[00:25:30] Michael Weinberg: So, are you starting to see students coming in with that mindset that they want to learn these two aspects but to apply it in a way other than practicing? I think so. Although, I think, truth be told, there have always been students who’ve come into law school and, at the beginning of their law school experience, didn’t think that going into a law firm or a large law firm was what they wanted to do. But so often, for a variety of reasons, they found themselves either pushed in that direction or that was the direction that was easiest to understand as a student. And so, one of the things that we’re trying to do is to set up a path and a guide that says, this may or may not be right for you, but if you’re curious about it, we’re going to explain what it means to do an alternative career path. We’re going to bring in people who want to mentor you and want to talk to you through the process so you can evaluate it. And then, if you decide it’s what you want to do, you have an opportunity to pursue that in a way that feels as supported as you would be as if you decided you wanted to go and start at a big law firm. So, we have fellows here at the center who are here explicitly to mentor. We have Sarah Feingold who, at one point, she was the, I think, 17th employee at Etsy and their first general counsel for about 10 years. And Sarah has come back and she’s done a number of other things in tech, and she’s a fellow, and her primary focus as part of her fellowship is to be a sounding board for students who think it would be fun. to be a sounding board for students who think it would be fun, it would be interesting to think about what it would mean to go in-house at a tech startup. I, myself, was a general counsel for a tech company for four years before I started here. And so, we want to make sure that students understand what that means and what they should be doing in law school now or years after they graduate to position themselves for those opportunities.

[00:27:37] Marlene Gebauer: Anna, you mentioned earlier that you want to engage with the law library community with this conference. What would you say this conference has to offer law librarians? And also, what do law librarians have to offer for others attending the conference?

[00:27:57] Anna McGrane: So, I suppose to start with the sales pitch for why you should come. Once a vendor, always a vendor. You know, there really is a goal, and bearing in mind that we’re just in the initial stages. So, for example, this year, we’ve got the chief product officer of Cura, who’s obviously actively engaged in some of the benefits of AI, who’s paired with Jason Schultz, who, as Michael has pointed out, has done a lot of work about some of the problems with AI and some of the dangers that we might face. And then, they’re going to be taking questions from these students from the Rights Over Tech group, who don’t only bring a perspective of, you know, what is the holistic implication or what are the holistic implications of legal technology. They also have PhDs in computer science and engineering and significant work experience. So, they’re able to ask what, for them, are very basic questions about how these technologies are being built and what we could potentially do with them to really improve our legal service delivery in a way that I think most of us are just not able to. do with them to really, you know, improve our legal service delivery in a way that I think most of us are just not able to. I don’t have the background to start to have that kind of conversation. The other part of it, of course, is that two-thirds of the folk that are attending are either NYU Law students or alumni. And I think one of the challenges that we have at a lot of these innovation conferences is that you get the folk who have started to think about innovation in a room. We all kind of agree that something needs to happen. And then one of the key stakeholders, the people who are practicing, are not at the table and they’re not engaged. So this is an opportunity for all of us to be together and to think proactively about what the future should look in what is a very neutral academic environment. As far as what we’re looking for, as I mentioned earlier, this is a conversation about technology. And one of the really privileged positions that a law librarian in big law or at a boutique or in-house has is that y’all have seen technology for the last 30 years develop. You spent a tremendous amount of time comparing technology softwares, looking at the algorithms, asking questions of vendors, seeing how everything’s been built. You’ve got education and information science and information architecture. And I think for us to really have a substantive conversation, we absolutely have to have that voice at the table and right from the beginning to make sure that we’re going on the right direction.

[00:30:27] Greg Lambert: Well, I can tell you, if you need someone to test some tech out that can break it, I’ve got somebody upstairs in my office that can help you out on that. So she’s really good at that.

[00:30:38] Anna McGrane: October 15th, 639. Come on.

[00:30:42] Greg Lambert: Well, I want to thank everyone, Felicity, Michael, Christian, and Anna. Thank you all for taking the time to talk with us today. It’s been a pleasure.

[00:30:51] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, thank you.

[00:30:51] Anna McGrane: Yeah, thank you so much. Thank you. Thanks, everyone.

[00:31:05] Greg Lambert: All right, Marlene. Well, that’s a wrap for this episode. We’d like to thank all of our guests here. So let me go back through and name them again. We had Felicity Conrad, Michael Weinberg, Christian Lane, and Anna McGrain. So thank you all for taking the time to talk to us. That was fun. And I was glad that the software didn’t break with having so many people on.

[00:31:27] Marlene Gebauer: We were a little worried there for a minute, but it turned out okay.

[00:31:32] Greg Lambert: Yeah, sure did. Thanks again, guys.

[00:31:34] Marlene Gebauer: Listeners, please take the time to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Rate and review The Geek and Review as well. If you have comments about today’s show or suggestions for a future show, you can reach us on Twitter at @GabeBauerM or @Glambert, or you can call the Geek and Review hotline at 713-487-7270. or email us at geekandreviewpodcast at gmail.com. And, as always, the music you hear is from Jerry David Disica. Thank you, Jerry.

[00:32:05] Greg Lambert: Thanks, Jerry. All right, Marlene. We’ll talk to you later.

[00:32:08] Marlene Gebauer: All right, ciao for now. Hey, don’t take me away. I can walk on by the North Star, but I fail to notice that it’s still daylight, and the devil’s back on the bar, and the devil’s back on the bar, and the devil’s back on the bar.

Makerspaces are becoming very popular in libraries, and today we talk with two librarians who are ready to bring the collaborative thinking and working spaces into the law school library environment. Ashley Matthews is at George Mason’s Antonin Scalia Law School, and Sharon Bradley is at the University of Georgia School of Law. Both believe there is a great benefit in carving out spaces within the law school library to allow students and faculty the ability to tinker and experiment with their creative sides, and potentially come up with the next big idea in the legal market.

Matthews recently wrote an article on makerspaces entitled “Teaching Students to ‘Tech Like a Lawyer’.” While some of us may see ‘tech like a lawyer’ as a way to stop technology, Matthews and Bradley think that the law school library environment can be the perfect place to teach law students the analytical skills they’ll need in their practice to truly understand how a legal issue can benefit from technology, and how to issue spot, reason, analyze, and resolve legal issues more effectively with technology.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

 

Information Inspirations

The Dangers of Categorical Thinking

The human mind is build to categorize the things we see and do in the world. It just helps us make sense of the world, whether it’s the fight or flight between seeing a stick and a snake, or the business decisions we make in selecting the perfect candidate out of a pool of ten qualified applicants. We group the hard skills and the soft skills. In this Harvard Business Review article, the authors warns not to be so caught up in the larger categorical picture, and lose sight of the details and nuances that really make the difference in the end. Continue Reading The Geek in Review Ep. 53 – Makerspaces in Law Schools with Ashley Matthews and Sharon Bradley

Our fellow 3 Geeks’ contributor, Zena Applebaum is leading the upcoming Competitive Intelligence program in Chicago on Friday, October 18, 2019. The American Association of Law Libraries is holding this CI Foundations Course entitled, Superior Intelligence = Strategic Decision Making.

In this course you will learn to be the person who defines, gathers, analyzes, and distributes intelligence about products, customers, and competitors at your organization. You will also better understand how to establish and maintain a strategic competitive intelligence (CI) function–from development to implementation.

 WHO SHOULD ATTEND

Law librarians and legal information professionals seeking to learn how to build a competitive intelligence strategy at their organization (including firm, academic, government, and other organizations).

Early-bird pricing is available until September 20. So, register today!!

 

 

[Ed. Note: Please welcome guest blogger, Sam Harden, from vLex. – GL]

I used to watch a lot of Star Trek TNG – every episode it seemed like some super complicated futuristic technology was an instant solution to an intractable problem the crew was facing. Can’t find the cloaked Romulan ship? Modulate the tachyon pulse beam transmorgifier! I didn’t know this at the time, but things like that had become so common in the series that the script writers wouldn’t even bother coming up with the technical jargon when they were writing the script:

“It became the solution to so many plot lines and so many stories,” ST:TNG writer, Ron Moore said. “It was so mechanical that we had science consultants who would just come up with the words for us and we’d just write ‘tech’ in the script. You know, Picard would say ‘Commander La Forge, tech the tech to the warp drive.’

I’m serious.

Some Context:

I’ll come back to this concept of ‘teching the tech’ in a moment, but first let me lay some context. vLex has me doing free consulting sessions with anyone who wants them. So far I’ve done a good number of interviews – all legal professionals, either practicing law or working in the legal sphere in some capacity. Continue Reading Don’t Obsess Over the Details… Just ‘Tech the Tech!’

While we could talk all day with the husband and wife team of Andie Kramer and Al Harris about being BigLaw Partners, it is their work on women’s conflicts and bias in the workplace which brings them on the show today. Andie and Al recently released their second book, It’s Not You, It’s the Workplace: Women’s Conflict at Work and the Bias That Built It. And we jump in with both feet to discuss how the workplace environment, even at law firms (or maybe, especially at law firms), is designed to place women in adversarial roles against one another. Andie and Al have mentored women, conducted speaking consultations, and have written books on the subject of gender communications for over 30 years. Because they bring both the female and male perspectives into this very difficult conversation, they pack a one-two punch for their audiences and definitely grab their attention. When we asked Al Harris how important it was for him to bring in men into this conversation, his answer was, “in a word… VERY!”
We take a deep dive into the issue of gender bias in the workplace, and the environment which contributes to that very bias. You can learn more about Andie Kramer and Al Harris, including a question guide to their books, at their website, andieandal.com. Definitely check out the website after you listen to this week’s interview!

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify
What Does Your Family Think You Do??
We have one more story this week about a family member who thinks that being a library manager is a glorified file clerk job. We imagined that Thanksgiving that year was a little awkward. If you have a story to share, leave us a message at 713-487-7270 or email us your story at geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com.

Information Inspirations

Come on men… it’s 2019!!
The Pence Rule of a man not being alone with a woman in the workplace, or attending a social event with alcohol without having a man’s wife present is affecting work environments, including law firms. American Lawyer senior columnist, Vivia Chen’s article, #MeToo Backlash Is Not Going Away, shows how men are less likely to work in one-on-one situations with women at a higher rate in 2019, than in 2016. This is having a significant effect on the ability for women to have equal access to opportunities and advancement. Vivia puts it best when she says “Considering it’s 2019, it’s frick’n unbelievable.” We couldn’t agree more.

Continue Reading The Geek In Review Ep. 52 – Andie Kramer and Al Harris on Their New Book, It’s Not You, It’s the Workplace

Andre Davison was literally a sixteen year old student when he began his career in law firm libraries. Now the Research Technology Manager at Blank Rome’s Houston office, Andre has taken a leadership role both within his firm with technology and diversity programs, and has been rewarded for his efforts with multiple awards. Andre was awarded his firm’s Nathaniel R. Jones Diversity Award for his diversity efforts, and he was the American Association of Law Libraries’ Innovation Tournament winner for his Seamless Access to Secondary Sources (SASS) which enabled lawyers and others at his firm to dive into the portions of research materials directly, and without having to worry about usernames, passwords, or client numbers. Previous TGIR interviewee, David Whelan, has a great summary of his experiences as a judge for the AALL Innovation Tournament.

Andre’s work expands past his award winning efforts at his firm, and he has taken on leadership roles on the local level with the Houston Area Law Libraries (HALL) as the current President. The local chapters are a wealth of professional development, and local community efforts which he says brings a family-like environment to him and his peers.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

How does your family describe what you do?

Speaking of family, we share stories of how our families describe to others what we do for work. As might be expected, it doesn’t always match the reality of the situation. Greg thinks that it might have been easier on his family if he worked at Walmart. We’d love to get more stories to put on the show of what it is that your family members think you do. Leave us a voicemail at 713-487-7270 or email us at geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.com and share your story!

Information Inspirations

How Should Law Schools Adjust for Gen Z?

Continue Reading The Geek In Review Ep. 51 – Andre Davison – Winning with Diversity and Technology

Welcome to the 50th Episode of the Geek in Review!!

American Lawyer Media Reporter, Dylan Jackson, joins us this week to discuss two of his recent articles which focused on the mental health of law firm staff, as well as the persistent caste system which still exists in the large law firm environment. Jackson talked with a number of people within law firms regarding how firms view the mental health of staffers, what firms are doing (or not doing) to address the issues, as well as how firms value their staff’s contribution to the success of the firm. While the days of having a chair tossed at you by a partner might have faded in the past couple of decades, the stress placed on staff to handle more work, and to take on much more strategic missions for the law firm has significantly increased over the past ten years. Jackson found that it is still difficult for even the most senior of staff to get a seat at the table within the law firm, and that old barriers still exist to separate lawyers from the professional staff. In the end, these professionals need to be recognized for their contribution, and they want to be treated with respect.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

Information Inspirations

The Dark Side of Personality Tests

Many law firms are conducting personality assessments on their lawyers and staff. The idea is that if we better understood each other’s personalities, we can communicate better. Author Quinisha Jackson-Wright points out in a New York Times piece a significant flaw in personality tests when other use it to “fix” the other person, rather than adapt their own behavior. It’s important that workers don’t feel like they are being “outed” by being a certain personality type. (Plus some extra reading) Continue Reading The Geek in Review Ep. 50 – ALM’s Dylan Jackson on the Issues of Mental Health and Overall Value of Law Firm Staff

Most of us learned that if you set goals, those goals should be measurable. Sameena Kluck, Vice President of Business Development at Paladin, PBC, sits down with us this week to discuss how Pro Bono goals should also be measurable. While Pro Bono work is primarily viewed as a way for lawyers to do “good work,” it has a larger impact than just on those receiving the work. We anecdotally know that Pro Bono impacts professional development, business development, recruiting, retention, attorney morale, marketing, branding, and more. However, there hasn’t been a very good way of actually quantifying how Pro Bono works affect the law firm. We’ve measured our work by the hours we put in (pretty typical for a law firm), but that doesn’t really tell us all the story. Sameena walks us through some of the metrics that she and Paladin are measuring to show the true value of Pro Bono work and how it benefits much more than just the Pro Bono client.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

Information Inspirations:

AI for the Business of Law

Jennifer Roberts, our Data Science Superhero from Ep. 26, has an article in LegalTechNews this week which says that the AI Hype Cycle might be in full swing when it comes to work that lawyers are doing, but that cycle is still in it’s infancy when it comes to the business side of the law firm. Specifically in the Business Development and is the Risk Management departments of law firms, AI is just getting started. Roberts lays out examples of ways which AI tools can identify client traits. Predictions and modeling on client’s likelihood of attrition, or forecasting client’s financial viability, or the buying patterns of clients are just a few things that AI can assist business development professionals. When it comes to conflicts, Roberts writes that AI can reduce the time it takes to clear conflicts by up to 80%. There’s definitely some value-add which AI can bring to the business side of the law firm table.

OKRs in Team Meetings

We talk a bit in the interview today about OKR (objectives and key results) to remain focused on your goals. Marlene found a great primer article to help you if you find yourself wasting time in meetings where OKRs can help. Bringing in OKRs can help your team stay focused on the goals, keep the motivation high, and allow the team to adjust course when necessary. Henrik-Jan van der Pol’s article, “Use OKR to make team meetings more focused, effective, and meaningful,” is a great place to start if you’re looking to tighten up those meetings, and stay on target for your team’s goals. For additional reading, check out the difference between OKRs and KPIs.

The 1619 Project and Howard University Law Grads

The New York Times Magazine launched an amazing expose on the 400th anniversary of slavery in the United States. One section focuses in on four recent law graduates of Howard University. It is a powerful piece which describes the journey of these families starting with their enslaved ancestors, and travel the path through today, and the lawyers’ plans for the future. There is also a 1619 Podcast launching this week as well.

Accelerated Learning

Mission.org provides concise summaries of management writings, and Marlene points us to one of her favorites. “131 Actionable Ideas from Ten Books I Wish I Had Read Ages Ago.” Author Louis Tsai walks through key takeaways of ten management books. In about 10 minutes, you should be all up to speed.

Listen, Subscribe, Comment 
Contact us anytime by tweeting us at @gebauerm or @glambert. Or, you can call The Geek in Review hotline at 713-487-7270 and leave us a message. We’d love to hear any ideas you’d like us to cover in future episodes. Also, subscribe, rate, and comment on The Geek In Review on your favorite podcast platform.
As always, the great music you hear on the podcast is from Jerry David DeCicca, thanks Jerry!

Transcript

[00:00:00] Marlene Gebauer: Welcome to The Geek in Review, the podcast designed to cover the legal information profession with a slant toward technology and management. I’m Marlene Gebauer.

[00:00:27] Greg Lambert: And I’m Greg Lambert. So coming up later in the episode, we talk with Sameena Kluck, Vice President of Business Development at PaladinPVC. And we talked to her about how to measure the return on investment that pro bono work brings into your law firm and ways to expand your relationship with clients through pro bono work.

[00:00:46] Marlene Gebauer: And before we get to that, I want to mention, Greg, that you and I had a great webinar this week with AALL about podcasting basics.

[00:00:54] Greg Lambert: Yes, we did.

[00:00:55] Marlene Gebauer: And I hope some of the listeners had a chance to join us for a little inside look at what we do to get the podcast out every week, and some suggestions on what someone would need to do to get their own podcast up and running.

[00:01:07] Greg Lambert: Yeah, that was a lot of fun. And if you are a AALL member, and you didn’t get a chance to listen in to the live webinar, we did record it so you can listen to it on the AALL website. And now Marlene, let’s jump into this week’s information inspirations.

[00:01:26] Marlene Gebauer: So my first information inspiration is, we’re going to revisit some AI this week, but hopefully I won’t be in the dark place that I was last week. We’ll see how this goes.

[00:01:39] Greg Lambert: So our guest from episode number 28, Jennifer Roberts, who we named the data scientist superhero.

[00:01:47] Marlene Gebauer: And she is.

[00:01:48] Greg Lambert: And she is. So she had a great article in the Legal Tech News this week on how artificial intelligence in law firms isn’t just for the work that the attorneys do for the clients. It can also help us gain insights about those very clients. So when it comes to the business side of law, Robert says that the AI hype cycle is still in its infancy. Some of the areas where AI can help us are things like buying patterns for specific segments of clients, prediction on the client’s likelihood of attrition, and forecasting the financial viability of those clients. She also points out a couple of low-hanging fruits in departments where AI tools can play a major role of moving them into the reactive rather than proactive participants in the law firm’s overall business strategy. And those are the business development department and the conflicts and intake group. So for BizDev, she points out that AI insights help deepen and even help mend relationships with the clients. She does that by exposing opportunities which may be hidden from the firm. For risk management, the use of AI can reduce the overall amount of time spent on conflicts. by up to 80%. As with most processes where AI is involved, it’s not solely the machine doing all the work. The processes, both human and machine, have to augment each other. The value add is made possible through the combination of both the legal professional and the allied professional and the analytical power brought in by the AI. So there, I think I stayed on the bright side of AI.

[00:03:25] Marlene Gebauer: You did. You did. You did a very good job with that. Greg, my first inspiration is using OKR, or Objectives and Key Results, to make team meetings more focused, effective, and meaningful. So I’ll ask the listeners, how many of us out there have found meetings where they’re kind of big time wasters, or they’re ineffective? You get off topic and leave without clear action items or decisions. Greg, has this ever happened to you?

[00:03:56] Greg Lambert: All the time.

[00:03:59] Marlene Gebauer: I am sure that we have all had this experience. Well, having OKRs, again, Objectives and Key Results, as part of your meetings may be the solution. There are potentially three big benefits. First is team goals stay top of mind. Second is motivation remains high. And third, you can adjust course if you need to. The article nicely lays out what to do and what to expect when you apply OKRs in your meetings. Now, one important note, OKRs are not the same as KPIs. So a KPI measures the success, the output, quantity, or quality of an ongoing process or activity. An OKR is a goal management framework that helps leaders lead their teams from A to B. So OKRs are essentially a bridge between ambition and reality. And as an example, if a KPI needs adjusting, an OKR is where you might start and make that adjustment become a key result. You got all that?

[00:05:04] Greg Lambert: I did. It was an acronym alphabet soup.

[00:05:07] Marlene Gebauer: It certainly was. Well, I think these are some of the acronyms that we really have to get into our nomenclature. I think, you know, we’ll be seeing a lot more of this stuff. So.

[00:05:18] Greg Lambert: Absolutely.

[00:05:19] Marlene Gebauer: There’s a test on this later. There’s a test on this later.

[00:05:23] Greg Lambert: So my second information inspiration comes from New York Times Magazine’s The 1619 Project. There’s a story within that focuses in on four recent graduates of law schools and their family history. It was 400 years ago this week, Marlene, that the first slave ship came in and landed in Virginia. And the New York Times is doing an expos├⌐ on the 400th anniversary. And in this expos├⌐, they cover a number of stories of interest. But the one that I focused in on when I looked at it is the story of the four recent Howard University Law School graduates, starting with their enslaved ancestors and then weaving the family history through today and what those recent law graduates plan to do with their future. The whole 1619 Project is a powerful ensemble of stories. And there’s also a podcast series from the New York Times that’s coming out. So I highly encourage everyone to check it out.

[00:06:26] Marlene Gebauer: That sounds like it will be very powerful. So I will definitely check that out. My second inspiration is for those of us strapped for time. So for those of us who are strapped for time but want to ingest all the business management books, I found something on Medium that might help you. Medium.org is a platform of articles and business tech podcasts designed to help accelerate learning. So the article I read was 131, so not 130, not 129, but 131 actionable ideas from 10 books the author wishes he had read years ago. So he distills the key points in various books like Purple Cow by Seth Godin, The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell, and Getting Things Done by David Allen, along with several other popular titles. So if you’ve read these books, it’s a great refresher. If not, you get the most important bits very quickly. I also like that it is an easy reference if you ever need to go back to it. I know Mission.org puts out a lot of content, and I’m definitely going to check out some of the various podcasts like Mission Daily and The Journey. And that wraps up this week’s Information Inspirations. Samina Cluck, Vice President of Business Development at Paladin PBC, joins us this week to talk about measuring ROI on pro bono work and looking at it as a business benefit for attorneys, firms, clients, and society. I really think this is going to be an interesting and modern spin on how pro bono can benefit law firms. Let’s take a listen.

[00:08:06] Greg Lambert: I’d like to welcome Samina Cluck, Vice President of Business Development at Paladin PBC, to this week’s episode of The Geek in Review.

[00:08:20] Marlene Gebauer: this week’s episode of the Geek & Review.

[00:08:22] Greg Lambert: Hey, thanks for joining us, Samina.

[00:08:23] Sameena Kluck: Thanks so much for having me. I’m thrilled to be on.

[00:08:26] Marlene Gebauer: So Samina, can you tell us a little bit about your background and about what you’re doing at Paladin?

[00:08:31] Sameena Kluck: Thanks for having me on because I’m really excited to tell this story. It’s been a kind of crazy eight months I’ve had. I am an attorney by trade. I only play one on TV for the last 16 years, but I briefly clerked for the Eighth Circuit after law school, and I worked at a small firm in St. Louis, Missouri, a civil litigation defense firm, and found it really wasn’t for me practicing law. I was really focused on marketing and business development and engaging with clients, cultivating relationships, and I just couldn’t find a good thought for that at the time. So I ended up at Thomson Reuters for 16 years in a variety of training and client development, global client management roles. Then at the end of last year, I kind of realized I’d been at the same place for 16 years and took the opportunity to go out and figure out what I was going to do with the second half of my life. But I was really looking for something that I was passionate about. I’ve always been pretty passionate about the legal industry and kind of things that are buffeting the industry right now, the changes with emerging technologies, diversity and inclusion, personal branding. I started working with the network of folks I kind of engaged with over the 16 years, and the Paladin Chief Operating Officer and Co-Founder, Kristen Sand├⌐, is somebody who we’d been on panels together, and I was really excited about how they were kind of sitting at the intersection of technology and access to justice and figuring out how can we help more attorneys do more good work benefiting everyone all around. As the Vice President of Business Development at Paladin, so really my role at Paladin is focused on going in and talking to law firms and in-house counsel teams about the pro bono programs they’re running now and seeing if we can partner using technology to streamline the administration of their pro bono programs so they can really focus on ramping up engagement and really making a deeper impact.

[00:10:23] Marlene Gebauer: Well, that is quite an interesting story. And I have to tell you, like we at the Geek in Review, we love to hear these stories about how people have essentially transformed their jobs and their careers over time and have gotten to places that they want to get to. These stories are always really interesting to us and I think to everybody else, so thank you for sharing that. you for sharing that. So people have been writing for years about how pro bono can be used to promote business. You know, it’s a good thing to be associated with good works. The same for professional development. So doing legal work pro bono helps attorneys get exposures to legal work that they might not get for some time working, particularly in big law. So what is the 10,000-foot view that you see for how tech and analytics are impacting the business case for pro bono?

[00:11:17] Sameena Kluck: I’m really glad you asked this because, of course, pro bono has been around a long time. I think as long as lawyers have been around, right? There’s been good works. There’s just not enough representation. There’s too many people unrepresented in our courts every day. And I think law firms have really built some pretty impressive pro bono programs that are having a huge impact for them in terms of a lot of aspects of their firm, professional development, business development, retention, recruiting, attorney morale, marketing, branding, all these things, but there hasn’t really been a way to kind of quantify what impact that’s making. Previously, the impact of pro bono was pretty much measured in terms of hours, right? So the Pro Bono Institute challenge or vault or various different surveys from the American Lawyer, people didn’t really know what happened with those hours, who was doing those hours, Lawyer, people didn’t really know what happened with those hours, who was doing those hours, how the attorney performing the work was really getting any benefit out of that, or how the firm might be. And now as we kind of think about the business case for pro bono, we’re looking at how can we leverage technology to capture metrics and KPIs in those areas. For instance, with retention, does providing attorneys meaningful work enable them to kind of find more value in their day-to-day jobs? I think the 400 largest firms are losing like 9.1 billion a year in attrition. So anything that can help that is a good thing. That’s a big number.

[00:12:41] Greg Lambert: Yeah, I saw that same report.

[00:12:44] Sameena Kluck: Well, and just, you know, the American Bar Association’s first profile of lawyers or something that was released at the annual meeting last weekend was pretty shocking. And a lot of the statistics around diversity and inclusion and how kind of white male dominated the legal industry is all around from the judiciary to law firms, you know, in terms of attorney wellness and mental health, we’re hearing so much about that now. If we can actually see the amount of pro bono attorneys are doing, can we say, hey, there’s actually something here that giving attorneys some meaningful work they value and they’re passionate about, can that help them remain in their practice longer and remain at your firm in their practice longer, right? You know, we’re hearing a lot about authenticity as well. I’ve actually been interviewing a lot of large law firm leaders the last week or two about how they’re encouraging authenticity from their employees and why that’s important. We’ve kind of gone through the circle, I think, of diversity. We’re bringing people into firms now who don’t necessarily look like everyone else. Inclusion of making sure they have a seat at the table, but now there’s a little bit more of this push around belonging and authenticity and making sure people feel like it’s okay to voice their opinion and to express interest in something different or to show that they have a different background. If I’m a first generation law student or lawyer, sometimes in the past, I might hide that fact about myself and try to blend in with everybody else. But instead, you know, maybe people say, hey, I came from Anacostia, D.C., you know, I went to this school that was a Title I school, and I would like to give back and do pro bono right there among, you know, my former community. If technology and analytics applied to pro bono can free up law firm pro bono teams from having to focus on the day-to-day right thing, like gathering emails in from 15 different legal aid organizations, cutting and pasting into one email, forwarding that, a spreadsheet to keep track of which attorneys expressed interest in which opportunities, phone calls, emails back and forth to legal aid organizations to see if your firm won that pro bono case or if it was actually taken four days ago by another law firm and you just didn’t know. it yet. For me, technology can centralize some of that, streamline some of that, and let the pro bono teams really focus on where could we be having more impact. What pro bono opportunities would give our attorneys more meaningful work or what would actually allow attorneys, you know, to partner with their clients or to develop skills they haven’t? To me, that’s really the greatest way technology and analytics can really harness the power of pro bono for law firms and in-house teams.

[00:15:25] Greg Lambert: So let me ask more of a specific question on what I’m gathering is you’re trying to show the return on investment or ROI on pro bono work. So I saw a recent tweet where you mentioned that pro bono work would be a great experience for a first-year associate. How can BigLaw use the tech like you have there at Paladin to incorporate pro bono more systematically into the professional development plan for these first-year associates as they progress up through the ranks?

[00:16:02] Sameena Kluck: I’m glad you asked that question. I think it’s a great question because I do think in BigLaw, you know, new attorneys just don’t get to practice as many skills when they start as in past years because we know there’s a lot of lawyers in law firms who are working on cases now. We’ve heard a lot about how Gen X is getting a little squeezed between the millennials and the baby boomers. the baby boomers. Yeah. Beyond that client, right?

[00:16:24] Greg Lambert: Sounds like you’ve been listening to our podcast.

[00:16:26] Marlene Gebauer: I know.

[00:16:27] Sameena Kluck: Just a little bit. And as a Gen X-er myself, I feel their pain, but also, you know, clients just aren’t willing to pay for new attorneys to get trained on the job on their dime. So it may be the case that a new attorney might be on the job for multiple years and not really get the same courtroom experience, deposition experience, client management experience, whatever that they might have in the past. At Pollinate, if we can capture what skills a legal aid organization says are required for an attorney to take on a certain pro bono matter, and even, you know, what skills they expect an attorney will master or at least get to work on through that, that’s going to help build a more holistic picture. for the law firm of, okay, here’s skills that our attorneys will need to do this pro bono and what they would gain out of it. And then be able to compare that against the firm’s professional development or learning plan for that individual associate. You know, and I want to say too, for new associates, you know, there’s obviously skills for new associates. There was a DLA associate at the event I tweeted, you mentioned that it was a DC Bar Pro Bono Partnership Luncheon, Naomi Abraham, and she was literally a first year associate talking the fact that, you know, she does IP work, but she was in a courtroom very quickly and she had to think on her feet and it made her more confident when she was dealing with her big corporate billable clients. And it’s, you know, not just new attorneys, you know, mid-level associates actually get to work on managing client expectations and emotions that they may not really get much practice with, with their billable clients. Senior associates are, perhaps their transactional attorneys can develop a few litigation skills in case they are going to be moving in-house that makes them a little more well-rounded for the kind of day-to-day pressure cooker you have in-house. And I think I heard the pro bono counsel, Wylie Ryan, say that really the key part of professional development as a lawyer is being able to appreciate different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences, right? That’s what clients want.

[00:18:29] Marlene Gebauer: Exactly. You know, I’ve always wondered, do pro bono clients or the organizations that represent them, do they ever get the chance to give feedback on how an attorney, a legal team, or a law firm is doing? You know, why do you think that’s important and what are some tech -enhanced ways that feedback can be obtained and used by firms in a business-minded manner?

[00:18:53] Sameena Kluck: Yeah, this is actually a really great question and something we’ve been thinking about a lot at Paladin. Traditionally, there’s not been much of a mechanism to collect this information from pro bono, you know, the direct clients or the legal aid organizations representing them. And also kind of vice versa. So, there’s not really been a great mechanism in law firms or in-house legal teams to kind of collect individual attorneys or legal teams.

[00:19:17] Marlene Gebauer: Because it’s interesting, isn’t it, that there isn’t that feedback because I think that would tie into some of the things you were talking about earlier, like, you know, are they satisfying the competencies, you know, in a professional development plan? Are they getting the experience that they need? That feedback loop sounds like it’s really something that is important, yet we don’t have it. So, where can tech help us?

[00:19:44] Sameena Kluck: Right, and so that’s something we’ve been thinking about a lot. We just ran a design sprint at the end of April with about a dozen pro bono counsel across the United States and Europe, really looking at pro bono reporting, which, like I said earlier, has really been focused mostly on hours. And so we started thinking through, how can we not only capture the impact the pro bono work is having, both for the direct client who’s receiving it and the legal aid organizations, but also for the attorney in the law firm? But beyond that, kind of thinking about, is there a way to really capture the quality of that work that was done in terms of, can we think about a way to survey clients, legal aid organizations, and the pro bono attorney at the end of a matter to collect robust data on that experience? Because if you have that data, you can ask the attorney, so, hey, you know, what was your experience working with XYZ legal aid organization like? Did you feel like you had enough training? Did you feel like there was, you know, enough client communication? So that law firms that have that information would be able to kind of tailor their programs accordingly and saying, wow, you know, attorneys really felt like they were shepherded through this process. You know, an IP attorney who had never done immigration work really felt like they were able to handle what they needed, and vice versa for a legal aid organization to say, gosh, we felt like there was great enthusiasm at this law firm, but the attorneys didn’t really feel prepared, and maybe we want to work with that law firm to think through how can we better develop our pro bono, you know, the work in the future on matters. Where do we need to take a step back and perhaps prepare guides or forms that would guide the attorneys better, that type of thing. So that’s really what we’re thinking about now, and we’re looking at whether we could develop a survey for doing that at the end of matters that would automatically go out to attorneys. to kind of collect their information, and if we’d have some mechanism for doing that with legal aid organizations, then that’s probably going to be another design sprint before we figure that out.

[00:21:46] Greg Lambert: Speaking of design sprints, I want to ask you about how to approach, say, pro bono in a different mindset. Normally we think of pro bono as giving lawyers opportunity to do work outside their normal day-to-day type of work, that they’re doing it, obviously, for free as a benefit to someone, and it can range from anywhere from people who do not or who cannot afford work to taking on an idea or an ideal that maybe the law firm wants to promote on its own. We talked a couple weeks ago, actually, with the Rule of Law Foundation president, Ian McDougall, who had highlighted some ways that firms can contribute pro bono initiatives by not necessarily by just putting in hours, but by actually leveraging tech and their legal expertise, and I know that your company is leveraging technology to help lawyers handle and track and measure pro bono measures. You see some vendors like Neodologic that are doing exercises like Iron Lawyer. We see legal design sprints that are very popular, and maybe you have some other examples on this, but how can pro bono work benefit firms from a business perspective and looking at it in a different way other than, these are the hours we spent on it?

[00:23:21] Sameena Kluck: And it’s a great question, and it’s kind of one of my favorite things. I’m actually going to be flying between DC, New York, and out to San Francisco in October because UC Hastings is going to be doing a hackathon on homelessness and partnering with law firms to really think through, are there technology solutions that would alleviate legal problems and access to justice issues for the homeless, right, in terms of, you know, would digital identity be a useful thing, but for me, design sprints, is something we do a lot of at Paladin. In fact, the platform we have today was only developed after doing a design sprint with pro bono counsel from law firms like Ben Weinberger from Vedran and folks from legal aid organizations like Kate Shank at LAF, I guess it’s now LAC in Chicago, because you could truly, we wanted to make sure we had all perspectives and look at a problem with empathy and kind of listen to your clients or your intended recipients before you draft what you think is the right solution, and I think that’s something, with legal thinking, I don’t think we often start there. I think we look at a problem, think about how we’ve handled the problem in the past, what we’ve seen in the past, and start working through a solution without always necessarily bringing other folks to the table to think about that, and there’s just a million examples of that in law firms, right?

[00:24:39] Greg Lambert: That’s how we’re taught in law school, you know, apply IRAC to everything and come up with your conclusion. Yes.

[00:24:47] Sameena Kluck: Yes, yes, and I interact with the best of them. But the thing is, there’s just so many people in a law firm who can bring so many different perspectives, and I’ll try not to get up on my soapbox that I always get on about the way so many people don’t get a seat at the table and are essentially labeled under the term non-attorney, which I find offensive, but-

[00:25:05] Marlene Gebauer: A legal support professional.

[00:25:08] Sameena Kluck: Exactly. Well, and that’s the thing, because I think we focus, when we look at the access to justice issues, we focus on pro bono as being a huge way to address that, and it is a great way to address it. I mean, at Paladin, we’re really, our first and primary focus is on getting more lawyers doing more pro bono work, whether they’re in-house or in law firms, so absolutely, that’s where we’re focused as well, but it’s going to take more than attorneys doing more pro bono to really move the needle on the access to justice gap, and it shouldn’t just be the provenance of those who have gotten a JD education, right? There’s innovation and practice management folks who can have ideas on the most efficient processes to streamline pro bono intake. Knowledge management folks can bring some insights into the type of data that might be best to utilize in a project or how to call it the best way or the contours of it. There’s just so much work to be done from everyone, and for me, if a law firm can bring together some of those folks who don’t always get to work together, whether that’s folks in different roles across the firm, whether that’s people, you know, I’ve had several firms lately come to me, transatlantic firms, and say, we really want pro bono where folks in our Charlotte office can work with folks in our London office, right? Like DLA’s new perimeter, bringing attorneys from across the world together to work on pro bono. It’s a great thing, too, just for younger attorneys or any attorneys to work with people outside of their practice group. I think when we can bring attorneys professionals together from across the firm, it’s a great way to bring a diversity of thought to thorny problems, and so I think it’s encouraging people to look to colleagues other than those they work alongside every day for help, even when they’re in billable client situations.

[00:26:54] Marlene Gebauer: I want to take that one step further. What about client engagement? So working with firm clients on some of these new pro bono opportunities, is there a market for that? Do we have any metrics or success cases where this work can strengthen the firm-client relationship?

[00:27:14] Sameena Kluck: Oh, absolutely. There’s a market for working with clients on pro bono, and I frankly don’t know why every lawyer is not trying to do pro bono with their in- house counsel, because over the past few years, regardless of your politics in this kind of administration that we’re in in this country, there have been a lot of people clamoring to do more to help other Americans, other citizens, other folks living here, right? I think there were a lot of attorneys who saw immigration attorneys rushing to airports a few years ago and saying, wow, I wish I could do that. I don’t have that expertise. I’m scared. I don’t know how to do immigration work. Although I will tell you, there’s immigration work being done by all kinds of lawyers all across the country. We see a lot of that on Paladin.

[00:27:57] Greg Lambert: And just a side note on that. When that was happening, the attorneys were using Neo2Logic, and actually Ryan McLeed was up apparently all weekend creating the airportlawyer.com website that was going on using a sprint design, working with attorneys. But Ryan is not an attorney. He was the talent that we needed. And it doesn’t matter if you throw every attorney at an issue. If they’re not the right type of person to handle the right type of job, then the effect is minimized. So, sorry, a little aside there.

[00:28:37] Sameena Kluck: No, and that’s fascinating. And that’s a great example. There have been great things that 650 at Wilson-Sonsini, the types of tech and apps they’re developing, the Hello Landlord, Landlord Tenant app in Arizona. There’s a lot of great things that can be done. And what I keep hearing from in-house lawyers that I’ve talked to over the last few years is they really want to do more pro bono. But they have such small teams, or sometimes they’re so specialized in very nuanced areas, they’re not always comfortable going out and taking on individual matters. And at Paladin, we see a lot of in-house pro bono, a fair amount, is very heavily event-based rather than individual matters. But firms, big firms are generally, a lot of them are full-service national firms. They’ve got numerous attorneys in numerous practice areas across numerous geographies. And so if a law firm partnered with their client on pro bono, they can provide more of that structure and oversight and subject matter expertise that the in-house team might not have. But together, they can kind of confidently pursue the matters. And the benefits for the relationship are just beyond, right? Like joint pro bono can allow the outside counsel and the client to spend time together, not in a billable setting, not where anyone’s trying to sell anyone anything, and really understand desired communication styles. Oh, this is how, you know, I’ve been talking to the general counsel about these kind of top level matters. But this is really when they’re in the thick of a matter, this is how they like to work on things. This is their working style. You know, an AMLA 10 partner recently told me that with joint pro bono, you can build trust because no one’s trying to sell anyone anything. And you actually just get to know each other.

[00:30:30] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, you build a real relationship, not just a working relationship. And I can’t see how that doesn’t strengthen the ties between, you know, the firm and the client for the future.

[00:30:30] Sameena Kluck: Absolutely, absolutely. And I mean, I’ve met in-house counsel who were really grateful when they had a partner at a law firm who introduced them to another in-house counsel in the vertical they were in, because they were able to kind of get some, you know, experience and insights from them. And we have some examples of this, sorry, you asked for statistics, but like Denton’s and Allstate Insurance have a clemency project, and they have filed 75 different clemency petitions through that partnership. Invaluable to their working billable relationship they have. Verizon and DLA have done a lot of projects together. John France at Verizon has written a lot about this. Lisa Dewey at DLA and Ann Ford have spoken to me about this. and just talking to high school students, generally in underprivileged areas, about the law. So, right away, we know that American citizens don’t know a lot about their rights, and especially their rights when they’re out in their own communities. But also, they’re encouraging those students to careers in the law, right, which we know is an issue from that recent ABA report. And we’re trying to foster that as well. We’re running a pilot right now with Dell and a couple of their outside counsel on doing pro bono.

[00:32:06] Marlene Gebauer: Well, big law, you know, if you’re hearing this, pay attention.

[00:32:12] Greg Lambert: Definitely.

[00:32:13] Sameena Kluck: Absolutely.

[00:32:14] Greg Lambert: One of the things that we are doing on our senior management team here at my firm is reading things like John Doerr’s Measure What Matters book. I’m curious, at Paladin, what are you guys reading and what’s kind of your guidebook for measuring what matters out there?

[00:32:34] Sameena Kluck: Wow, I’m so glad you asked this question, because I’m actually writing a piece right now on how different it is going to a mission-based startup from being in a, you know, enterprise-wide, at some point, 60,000 employee tech company for the past decade and a half of my life. And it’s fascinating to me. We actually have OKR meetings at Paladin about every, I guess we have them once a month. For a while, we were having them every other week. And we have product prioritization meetings every other week. We call it the Fortnightly product prioritization meetings. We’re a bit of a nerdy group, and there’s settlers of Catan at our retreats and everything you would expect from a startup. I love that game. I love that game. We play that all the time.

[00:33:18] Greg Lambert: So, Fortnite is in every two weeks, or Fortnite is in the game?

[00:33:21] Sameena Kluck: As in every two weeks, although, yeah, I am a mom of a Fortnite 10- year-old addict, so. We all are. Join the club. But what’s fascinating to me, I don’t know exactly what Felicity and Kristen, our co-founders, are reading, but one of the things I’ve been really fascinated about in these meetings is, when we’re talking about product prioritization, and this is our roadmap for the things we’re going to be building this two-week sprint we have coming up in the next two weeks and this quarter and this year, and every two weeks, we’re going back and forth. And thinking about, is there anything we need to change or move up? They’re asking me, Samina, when you’re talking to law firms, what are you hearing about what they need? Do we need to tweak this? We’re talking to our legal aid organization relationships woman, what they need. But there’s always another question in every meeting, no matter what we’re doing is, how is this going to impact the access to justice gap? Not, how is this going to help us sell more of Paladin? How is this going to help us get more legal aid organizations using the service? Because they get the service for free, they don’t subscribe to it. But really, at the end of the day, how is this going to help the client? What is this going to do to move the needle on that? And it’s just such a refreshing change from how I have looked at how we’re measuring success and progress in the past and other companies. At other companies, obviously, we have had mission statements and values that we all aspire to. And they were on our end-of-the-year performance review systems. You had to say how you did all these things, how you put trust at the heart of everything and put the client first. But it’s a little humbling to think about, at the end of the day, we’re just another company. When we’re no longer here, or when we’ve moved on, what did we do to really help that woman who is seeking a domestic violence protection order? Or to help that immigrant who’s just seeking asylum and trying not to get deported and separated from their children? That’s powerful to me.

[00:35:30] Greg Lambert: I like the idea. In fact, I think I’m going to pitch that every meeting should now end with, okay, how does this help the client? I like that.

[00:35:39] Marlene Gebauer: Oh, absolutely. That’s the endgame, right?

[00:35:43] Greg Lambert: Yeah. All right. Well, Samina, thank you very much for taking the time to talk with us today.

[00:35:48] Sameena Kluck: Thank you so much for having me on. I really appreciate it. Thank you.

[00:36:01] Greg Lambert: Samina gave us some really good insights on the power that pro bono work can be used to leverage education, client relations, and how to measure the results of the work. It’s kind of like when you are out on vacation, Marlene, and they say, if you don’t take pictures, it didn’t happen. Same thing. If you don’t measure it, it didn’t happen. Exactly. The idea of sitting down and doing a sprint design between clients and law firms and finding a common mission where you can place your resources, you can learn from each other, and make a difference on something that matters to both the client and the law firm, that’s just a golden opportunity. And the thing that I think I liked the most was when she talked about at the end of the meetings, asking the question about how is this going to impact our mission? I truly do think that all meetings should end with that question.

[00:36:53] Marlene Gebauer: So I agree with everything you’ve said. And I will add that I also liked the perspective that Samina gave us on how pro bono can be used more formally to develop attorneys, both in their professional development and also to develop and deepen client relationships. I mean, I think pro bono has historically been looked at as a good thing because, first of all, it is a good thing. And more informally, that it gives attorneys some exposure to skills that they might not get right away. What Samina was talking about is really you can make this a much more formal program for your attorney education. And also working directly with clients on projects, both legal and maybe more tech-influenced to really sort of experience the relationship a different way. So it’s not just kind of you’re doing their business and you’re doing the work for them, but you guys are working together on a solution for others. And I think that that can lead to sort of a deepening relationship. And I think that’s something that everybody wants.

[00:38:14] Greg Lambert: Totally agree with that. All right, Marlene. Well, that brings us to the end of another episode. I want to thank Samina Kluck again for talking with us this week.

[00:38:23] Marlene Gebauer: Yeah, thank you very much to Samina. Do us a favor, listeners, and subscribe to the Geek & Review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Rate and review us as well. If you have comments or suggestions, you can reach us on Twitter at GabeauerM or at Glambert. Or you can call the Geek & Review hotline at 713-487-7270. And as always, the music you hear is from Jerry David DeSicca. Thank you very much, Jerry.

[00:38:57] Greg Lambert: All right. I will talk to you later, Marlene.

[00:39:00] Speaker E: Okay, Greg. Bye-bye. Hey, hey, don’t take me away. I could walk on by the North Star. But I fail to notice that it’s still daylight. And the devil’s back from afar. And the devil’s back from afar. And the devil’s back from afar.

When mega-legal publisher, Thomson Reuters, acquired regional legal publisher, O’Connor’s in January 2018, there were many Texas lawyers and law librarians who worried about what would happen to this very popular publisher. Greg sits down with former O’Connor’s Vice President, Jason Wilson, and talks about the history of O’Connor’s, why they focused on information design, and the plain English style of writing of their books. Wilson says the secret to good publishing, is spending a good amount of time preparing the material, and a systematic approach to organizing the material in a way that makes sense to the attorneys. While O’Connor’s has be gobbled up by Thomson Reuters, Wilson thinks that there is still a lot of room for small and regional legal publishers. In fact, he says it makes perfect sense for large publishers to license some of their more regional or niche materials to smaller vendors so that they can give it the attention to detail those topics need.

Listen on mobile platforms:  Apple Podcasts LogoApple Podcasts | Overcast LogoOvercast | Spotify LogoSpotify

Information Inspirations
In a world where you can’t swing a swag back at a legal conference without hitting a vendor claiming to have AI which will transform the industry, is ROSS Intelligence pushing it a little too far when they claim that they’ve pulled legal research out of the “dark ages” and that they’ve eliminated the need for humans to compile information found in traditional secondary sources (AKA treatises)? Greg suggests that when you read PR like this, have your law librarian test it to see if it really is transformative, or if it is purely PR speak.
Thomson Reuters recently published a white paper called The Next Gen Leadership: Advancing Lawyers of Color (pdf). In a legal industry which is 85% white, and 64% male (compared to US stats of 76.6% and 49.2% respectively), TR sets out to interview 23 attorneys of color across the country to find out what they see white/male attorneys are doing to advance and retain lawyers of color. There are three themes picked up by TR in the interview which cover:

Continue Reading The Geek in Review Ep. 48 – Jason Wilson on Small and Regional Legal Publisher Survival in Today’s Market