It’s November and that means you have probably noticed that shaving habits among some of the men in your life have become somewhat lax. No, this is not the result of a Gillette strike or a national shaving cream shortage, it’s Movember.
Every November, men across the globe stop shaving their upper lip to
This post originally appeared on the HighQ Solutions blog.
Being chastised for using the apparently un-Texan term “nincompoop” I have switched to the more general “Ninnies” in an attempt to keep this dialog above board. So now we can dive into my attack of Susan’s response, to Ryan’s ramblings on Susan’s reply to Jordan’s retort to my critique of Jordan’s original
from Susan Hackett‘s comment on yesterday’s post.
 |
| Image [CC] – Matthias Weinberger |
I was chatting yesterday with a great guy who’s been in-house as a GC for most of his professional life, and has recently affiliated with a law firm. He loves this firm and he loves the people he works with, but
Puzzle me this: If a lawyer conversed with a client in front of a law enforcement representative, would the conversation be privileged?
Answer: No.
Conversations held in the presence of any third party, let alone one representing the government, would constitute a waiver of privilege.
Previously on 3Geeks (and perhaps too many times) we have
Jordan and I will need to add Susan Hackett to our traveling road show as she has now entered the fray. Below Susan responds to Jordan’s critique of my critique of his original post. (Just writing that makes me kind of dizzy).
See if you can follow the bouncing ball in this interesting debate.
Thanks to Susan for adding to
This post originally appeared on the LexisNexis UK Future of Law Blog under the title Stealing the market: The degree that now has infinite value.
 |
| Image [cc] – doozle |
On 17 October I saw Daniel B. Rodriguez, Dean of the Northwestern University School of Law, speak at the ARK Knowledge Management in the Legal
 |
| Image [cc] Shane Trueblood |
Jordan Furlong and I need to take our show on the road. In our usual “Dan & Jane” fashion, we inadvertently tackled another topic. My original post threw down the gauntlet and Jordan, in his always well-stated fashion, answered the call. Below is his response – with a promise of more to come.
Thanks Jordan!
Update 11-4-13: Jordan
 |
| Image [cc] Grand Canyon NPS |
My posts have subsided a bit lately as I felt an echo chamber growing and started questioning a lot of stuff I was reading as either echoes or reiterations of prior statements. Some of these echoes are new angles on old subjects, but they merely restate the basic premise: BigLaw
