I know I write my fair share of crap that is of minimal value to anyone, but that’s why we invite Casey Flaherty to post his epic legal tone poems on 3 Geeks. His insight and valuable contributions balance my own questionable efforts. After today, the ABAs Law Technology Today is in desperate need of
Share and share alike
I recently gave a ‘client case study’ presentation at the HighQ Client Forum in NYC (recapped here). On the day, I opened my talk thusly:
I am of the opinion that I could tell you absolutely everything I have done at the firm for the last three years in excruciating detail, with charts,
HighQ’s Big News
If you read Legal IT Insider, or if you follow Greg or me on Twitter, you have probably heard the big news regarding HighQ.
They hired me! (Oh, and they got some investment of some kind. I don’t really follow that stuff, but hey, I guess that’s pretty cool too!)
As of today, I
Aha! A.H.I!
I wrote a post last week in which I called for a moratorium on the term Artificial Intelligence in relation to the law. Instead I suggested that you should just replace AI with the term Automation because “they’re exactly the same thing, at least as far as the current legal market is concerned.”
Some people
Another 3 Geeks Book Review: You know, for kids!
Every year after ILTA, I generously offer to publish the written version of my co-presenters talks here on 3 Geeks. This year Noah Waisberg’s written contribution wasn’t delivered to me until late November (nearly 3 months after we presented!!) and I publicly chastised him for his “much belated” contribution.
It turns out that Noah
A.I. and Automation… Po-tay-to, Po-tah-to
I am calling for an official moratorium on the term Artificial Intelligence in relation to the law! Everyone please just stop using it. It’s a needlessly charged word that only confuses and clouds the underlying issues whenever it comes up.
From now on any time you feel the need to use the term Artificial Intelligence, replace
Do More Law
This is the (much belated) final talk from the ILTA Session – Legal Technology Innovation – Bolstering and Destroying the Legal Profession. This post is from Noah Waisberg, CEO of Kira Systems. See other related posts from Michael Mills, Stuart Barr, Joshua Lenon, and myself by following the links
Stop the AI madness!
The third law of prediction from the late great Arthur C. Clarke, is that “any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
If Sir Arthur were writing today I think he may have replaced ‘magic’ with ‘artificial intelligence’.
AI has become our modern sorcery. It’s both our savior and our bogey-man. It will most likely
The inexorable advancement of technology: an opportunity or a threat for the legal sector?
This is the fourth talk from the the ILTA Session – Legal Technology Innovation – Bolstering and Destroying the Legal Profession. This is from Stuart Barr, COO at HighQ.
A lot has happened in the AI world in the last year. Robots can now create art, learn how to play computer games
What are humans good for … in legal services?
This is the third talk from the the ILTA Session – Legal Technology Innovation – Bolstering and Destroying the Legal Profession. This is from Michael Mills, Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer at Neota Logic.
I decided to come at the technology question from the human side, to speculate about what humans are still good