tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248863093001003125.post7234604676091340405..comments2009-11-11T20:43:47.499-06:00Lihsahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07377484000156287824noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248863093001003125.post-82965090947721336002009-11-11T20:43:47.499-06:002009-11-11T20:43:47.499-06:00My thoughts behind making a &quot;newspaper&quot; out of lists would be help folks like myself who have an eclectic group of friends. I was thinking I could have a KM &quot;paper&quot;, a Library &quot;paper&quot;, a Marketing &quot;paper&quot; and a &quot;lawyer&quot; paper. Plus, I&#39;d make sure that I dropped the &#39;biggies&#39; off of those lists so I wouldn&#39;t end up with a bunch of Holy Kaw&#39;s on each of the results. <br /><br />Even as is, this works pretty well in letting me see some good information, in a good format, in a short amount of time.Greg Lamberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01517081481973019036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248863093001003125.post-17259727355478885952009-11-11T13:50:12.288-06:002009-11-11T13:50:12.288-06:00Based on your review, I signed up and find it to be an interesting approach.<br /><br />Two of the biggest problems with Twitter are filtering and relevancy. This addresses these problems by finding the stuff mentioned most recently by your network.<br /><br />To me, lists are just another filtering mechanism and do not help with relevance.Doug Corneliushttp://www.compliancebuilding.comnoreply@blogger.com