6/4/09

Google Squared - Better Than Wolfram Alpha on Legal Searches?

We blogged about the release of Wolfram Alpha a couple of weeks back, and discussed how it was "cool" but not ready for legal research topics yet. Yesterday, Google Labs released its new semantic search tool called Google Squared to the public. I thought I'd test some of the same legal search terms that we tried with Wolfram Alpha, to see how G2 would do. My initial reaction is that G2 does a lot better than Wolfram Alpha, but probably still something you wouldn't want to hang your legal hat on.
Here are the terms, and you can click to see the results:
The first thing that popped out at me on these searches was the fact that the order in which you placed the words mattered. We had to change some of the order of the words within the search to get better results. Again, these results weren't the ultimate answers we were looking for, but at least we were able to get something back and we could then start manipulating our search from there. With Wolfram Alpha, we just could never get that far.
I also plugged in some other search terms that I found on the Law Libraries Ning site. Scott Frey asked Wolfram Alpha about "Justice of the US Supreme Court" and got information on Justice, Illinois, Supreme, Louisiana, and Court, Bern -- not exactly what Scott was looking for.
I tried the same search with G2 and got a much better result. It actually gave me names, pictures, dates of birth, and more on actual US Supreme Court Justices.
That is a much better result than what we were getting with Wolfram Alpha.
Semantic search engines, like Google Squared, still have a way to go before being used as a viable legal research tool. In fact, most researchers would say that the original Google is a better legal research tool than any of the new semantic resources.
Go out and give Google Squared a try with your legal (or non-legal) terms and let all of us know what you think of G2.

Bookmark and Share

6/2/09

I'm Diggin' the New Way to 'Conference'

I may be a little late to this party, but I'm truly, truly enjoying the trend in making conferences and specialized presentations available using real-time video feeds. In fact, just today I was able to watch two outstanding presentations -- all from the comfort of my office chair. The Berkman Center at Harvard University's Law School presented Lokman Tsui's "Beyond Objectivity: Global Voices and the Future of Journalism." At the same time, I was also monitoring the Computers Freedom & Privacy Conference 2009.
As much as I enjoyed (actually, as I'm writing this.. 'am enjoying') the presentations, it was actually the "process" of how these video conferences were being presented that really got the gears in my mind to churning. There were some subtle differences that I noticed between Berkman's proprietary and more established presentation model versus the UStream or Twazzup's generic model. In fact, I'm so excited about the potential of using online video streaming and mashup sites, that I'm going to see if I can get some of the organizations that I'm a member of to try this type of presentation in the near future.
Berkman Center Model:
The Berkman Center's method of presentation is an older and more established method of presenting video on the Web. I haven't talked with anyone at the Berkman Center on what they use for their video presentations, but it is pretty apparent they are using Macs and Quicktime on the backend. They also allow you to 'chat' via IRC (and if you know what IRC is, you probably also have a copy of Led Zepplin IV on real-to-real). And, for the true uber-techie... you can also jump into your Second Life character and interact with others watching the presentation.
The Berkman model is one that many of us have seen for years. Although they've included the IRC and Second Life methods of chatting with other online watchers, but overall this is the standard model we've known as online video feeds.
The UStream or Twazzup Model:
The 'newer' model of mashing up video and web 2.0 tools used by UStream is a method that really appeals to my idea of what an online presentation can be. You not only get the video and audio feed of the presentation, you also get some value added products from the others watching the feed, and a chance to chime in with your comments or questions. I specifically like the Twazzup model which combines the Twitter comments (via designated hash tag), additional 'keywords', data on the speakers, the popular links that people are adding to their tweets, and who are the people contributing the most to the conference twitter feed.
I've noticed that the CFP09 conference did an excellent job of making the audience go up to the mic to ask their questions, and also made a good effort to answer or comment on questions that came in via Twitter. One thing that I'd like to see from conferences use streaming video, is an additional window that shows the overhead information that is projected on the screen behind the speakers. UStream also places advertising from time to time at the bottom of the video feed.
I took a few screenshots of the Berkman and UStream presentations to show some of the esthetic differences. Also, take a look at a related post we did a few weeks ago on the dilution of message using these presentation methods.
The Berkman Presentation
The Berkman Presentation Video w/i PPT Presentation
The "Oblong" Table Discussion (note the blogging & twittering!)
The Questions *no mics for audience*
The Answers

The UStream or Twazzup Model
Video Feed
Twitter Search w/Trending Words
Real-Time Tweets
Speaker Info (I'm not sure this really works!)
Links that people are Tweeting
Twitter Contributors
Questions from the Audience (notice the mic!)
Ads!! (Hey, UStream has to make money, right?)

Bookmark and Share

6/1/09

Twttrlist Anyone?


NOTE: Guest Blogger, Laura Walters joins us one more time to give her review of Twttrlist. Laura's joined us before with her "Who Washed My Briefs" posting.

So, reading Seth Godin’s blog recently I came across a new Twttrlist tool via Squidoo. Having used a Squidoo lens site while writing my MBA dissertation on Virtual Worlds, I was familiar with the site and the technology to some extent and curious as to how this would work with building a more permanent list of favorite Tweets.

I asked the Geeks for a review – and walked right in to another guest blog spot. Fortunately, this app is pretty user friendly, so even a part-time Geek like myself could figure it out and set up a simple demo in about 30 minutes. I opted to use a Geek test subject and create a quick list of some of my favorite Tweets from, or about, @glambert.

To make things more interesting, the Twttrlist folks are in the process of giving away some Kindles to promote their app. http://www.squidoo.com/twttrlist-win-a-kindle

On with the review. The concept is simple enough: do a search on a Twitter name, hashtag topic, or keyword of your choice. From the search results, Add the Tweets you want to file in the permanent list, which should appear under My List. When you are done adding Tweets, click Done Adding (one thing I like about Squidoo is their sense of humor about editing tools and functionality - I was loading the page to make some edits and it said, “Drum roll please…”).

One immediate drawback I noticed, it looks like you are only allowed to search back about a week on the initial list creation (once your lens is created, you can add older Tweets, but this isn’t explained anywhere on the creation site).

After you have your list, you must allow the app to access your Twitter account. After this, you are prompted to select a category for your list (somewhat limited here – the closest category they had to Law was Business), and add keywords about the list. The keywords seem picky – or there’s a hang up when you go to create your list – as it seems to only accept one keyword. To make matters worse, it will use your keyword to create your lens title. “Best of ______ on Twitter”. I initially used “law” as the keyword and then had to go in and change the title once my lens was created.

Obviously, you must have a Squidoo account (lensmaster) or create one to set up a Twttrlist, but there is no charge for this.

Once your lens is created, you can edit it to add additional Tweets to the list, bio info about yourself, photos, and so on. You can also add your own Tweet feed at the bottom of the list – or create a “best of” list of your feeds for promo. You can add tags to make your lens easier to find in searches.

And here you have it…the best of (some of) glambert! http://www.squidoo.com/bestofglambertontwitter


Laura Walters is the Director of Practice Group Management at Foster Pepper PLLC in Seattle, WA. Laura has spent more than 15 years specializing in change management, business development, and competitive intelligence for both law firms and corporations.

Bookmark and Share
 

© 2011, All Rights Reserved.