The value of Online Social Networks, such as LinkedIn are becoming more of a mainstay in the large law firm arena. Usually the taboos that follow these types of “outside the control of the firm” technologies prevent the use by lawyers or staff of the firm. However, I am seeing a shift in the attitude of some of the firms, and an embrace, although a weak embrace, of some of the functionality that these types of services can bring to the firm.
Law Firm Alumni Groups
I broke out my “researcher” cap and started delving through the LinkedIn Groups page to see how many of the top 100 law firms had some type of Alumni or Employee LinkedIn Group. I found that 35 firms out of the top 100 had a LinkedIn Group page. Most of them were Alumni groups, but there were a few that had current employee groups along with the Alumni, or specific groups just for employees. And, a few were apparently rouge employees that created a group at some point, but never did anything with the group after it was created.
Here is a list of the 35 firms, ranked highest to lowest by the number of members, and the type of LinkedIn Group:
| Firm Name | Members | Type |
| 839 | Alumni | |
| 323 | Alumni | |
| 281 | Alumni | |
| 278 | Employee & Alumni | |
| 183 | Employee & Alumni | |
| 159 | Alumni | |
| 88 | Alumni | |
| 61 | Current Employees | |
| 53 | Alumni | |
| 52 | Alumni | |
| 51 | Alumni | |
| 51 | Alumni | |
| 45 | Alumni | |
| 45 | Alumni | |
| 40 | Alumni | |
| 40 | Employee & Alumni | |
| 31 | Alumni | |
| 21 | IP Attorneys | |
| 17 | Employee & Alumni | |
| 15 | Derivatives Lawyers | |
| 10 | Alumni | |
| 10 | Washington Alumni Group | |
| 9 | Alumni | |
| 9 | Alumni | |
| 8 | Alumni | |
| 5 | Current Employees | |
| 4 | Employee & Alumni | |
| 3 | Alumni | |
| 2 | Current Employees | |
| 1 | Current Employees | |
| 1 | Alumni | |
| 1 | Current Employees | |
| 1 | Current Employees | |
| 1 | Alumni | |
| 1 | Current and Former Paralegals |
LinkedIn Profiles For Each Law Firm
Well, these results got me thinking about the number of LinkedIn profiles that are also linked to these specific law firms. I decided to take a look at the LinkedIn Company data for each of these 35 firms, and jotted down some stats for each.
For this portion I looked at the following information:
1. Number of profiles linked to the firm (LinkedIn max is 500+)
2. Percentage of these profiles that had an "Attorney" title (associate, partner, counsel, etc.)
3. Median Age of the LinkedIn profile members
4. Percentage Male
5. Percentage Female
Here is the results:
Firm Name | Number of LinkedIn Members | "Attorney" Titles (%) | Median Age | Male (%) | Female (%) |
500+ | 60 | 30 | 55 | 45 | |
500+ | 42 | 34 | 57 | 43 | |
500+ | 60 | 29 | 54 | 46 | |
500+ | 57 | 29 | 52 | 58 | |
500+ | 55 | 31 | 56 | 44 | |
454 | 67 | 33 | 59 | 41 | |
500+ | 49 | 32 | 60 | 40 | |
323 | 56 | 36 | 59 | 41 | |
359 | 61 | 30 | 56 | 44 | |
500+ | 60 | 32 | 57 | 43 | |
500+ | 56 | 33 | 58 | 42 | |
357 | 71 | 34 | 59 | 41 | |
283 | 66 | 31 | 65 | 35 | |
500+ | 62 | 34 | 55 | 45 | |
470 | 58 | 28 | 59 | 41 | |
500+ | 62 | 31 | 50 | 50 | |
500+ | 60 | 37 | 60 | 40 | |
500+ | 69 | 35 | 57 | 43 | |
224 | 64 | 33 | 53 | 47 | |
500+ | 64 | 32 | 58 | 42 | |
500+ | 65 | 33 | 58 | 42 | |
500+ | 62 | 32 | 54 | 46 | |
500+ | 50 | 33 | 53 | 47 | |
500+ | 57 | 34 | 57 | 43 | |
468 | 62 | 33 | 53 | 47 | |
500+ | 57 | 33 | 60 | 40 | |
500+ | 53 | 29 | 55 | 45 | |
457 | 56 | 28 | 52 | 48 | |
500+ | 59 | 31 | 60 | 40 | |
323 | 61 | 34 | 57 | 43 | |
500+ | 62 | 30 | 54 | 46 | |
500+ | 56 | 30 | 58 | 42 | |
500+ | 61 | 34 | 57 | 43 | |
500+ | 60 | 35 | 50 | 50 | |
373 | 52 | 33 | 57 | 43 |
From these results I was able to calulate the following:
% 500+ Members | 68% |
Avg. % Atty Titles | 59% |
Median Age | 32 |
Avg. % Male | 56% |
Avg. % Female | 44% |
Avg. "Group" Members | 78 |
No Surprises.... Well, Maybe One
Of course, there are a lot of things that pop out of these results that are interesting, but not all that unexpected. Things like the average age being in the early 30's isn't surprising, or that a majority of those profiled are male (just look around your firm.)
The one thing that did surprise me, was the large percentage of those profiled that had "Attorney" titles. I would have thought that there would be more "administrative" profiles (IT, Library, KM, Marketing, Competitive Intelligence, etc.) So, it would seem from this initial overview, that there are a lot of attorneys that are actually creating LinkedIn accounts. Granted, this doesn't say whether or not they actually used the LinkedIn account after they created it, but nonetheless, it does show that there is an interest in using this sort of Online Social Network.


3 comments:
"Median age = 32" is also a telling sign. New associates are deep into social networking - Partners are not. This brings to mind my bastardized Napoleon quote, "Old ideas don't die. You just kill the people who have them." ;-)
Nice Quote Toby... you should have your own demotivational calendar!
I have a feeling that this is a trend that the "old people" just won't be able to kill off. I wasn't surprised that the median age was 32, since it is a "new idea", but I was surprised at the number of attorneys and other employees that were using LinkedIn. And, it is apparent that they are doing a lot of things outside the confines of the Marketing Departments.
My firm's Marketing Dept is the group leading the charge re: LinkedIn. Prior to their push, the majority of profiles were admin, with a few attorneys. Many more attorneys on there now however.
Re: usage, I rarely see anyone from my firm "use" LinkedIn (besides myself - and even at that I'd say I'm a marginal user at best).
I think if our Marketing folks could come up with guidance on "how to USE LinkedIn" rather than just "how to JOIN LinkedIn" that would go a long way to squeezing measurable value out of it. Until then, I fear it will be no more than another MH-ish profile page.
Post a Comment